Uzun zaman olmuş ancak yabancı forumlarda gezinirken Türk ve Rus otomatikleri karşılaştırmışlar, bir alıntı yapayım dedim : Bu 50,000 fişek testinde adamlar mp 153e arıza yaptıramadıkları için 50000 de kesmişler, beretta, remington, whinchester gibi tüfekler 20000 in altında bozulmuş, Türk markalarını hiç saymıyorum bile 10000 i gören olmadı diyorlar. En sonunda da mp 153 ile bir Türk tüfeğini karşılaştırmak, Süpermenle cam adamı karşılaştırmak gibidir demiş amcalar, hangi Türk firmaları yazmıyor ama... Orijinal yazı aşağıdadır:
Russian
well, their guns are ugly and heavy. but it stops here. no focus on finish, all the focus on durability, infact, show their piston and bolt assembly to any mechanical engineer and he will immediately tell you that this gun is designed to last a long time.
there was a test in Italy sometime back, I dont have the video anymore. search the internet and u'll find it. in that test, they tried several brands of european and american shotguns, they fired the individual shotguns to failure point, guess which one came on top, baretta, remington, winchester and many other failed at less than 20,000. in case of a Baikal, the test was stopped cause they couldnt destroy the gun even at 50,000 rounds. dont even ask me about turkish guns, they all failed at less than 10K rounds. remember, these were only destructive tests, they didnt test the load sensitivity, pattern and other very important aspects of shotguns.
as far as pattern is concerned, it can be improved by buying after-market choke tubes, as far as load sensitivity is concerned, it can be cured by properly breaking-in the gun. Russians take weapon durability very seriously, there is a reason why Baikal mp153 was "russia's 100 best exports" and was "guns and ammo" gun of the year and was "shooting times" gun of the year.
its such a shame, comparing a turkish to Baikal. such a shame indeed.
Comparing Baikal mp153 to a Turkish is like comparing Superman to Mr. Glass.
